![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.gpaj.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/181129_01.jpg\")
<\/center><\/p>\n
\u3000Naoko Kumagai presented the role of fact-finding in preventive diplomacy. Kumagai explained that fact-finding is indispensable for the reinforcement of confidence building and is useful for preventive diplomacy measures, in particular early warning and mediation. <\/p>\n
\u3000Still, Kumagai emphasized the limitations of fact-finding as seen in biased fact collection and interpretations, which often occur even in U.N. human rights reports. Then she pointed out that fact-finding can be paralyzed once mutual confidence among parties is broken. <\/p>\n
\u3000She addressed the importance of fact-finding at the confidence-building level and suggested that a functional approach to fact-finding in technical issue areas would be possible even with the principles of non-interference. <\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.gpaj.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/181129_02.jpg\")
<\/center><\/p>\n
\u3000Kumagai suggested an independent ARF office or an office within the ASEAN Institute for Peace and Reconciliation which provides fact-finding mission, stores fact and data, serves as an arena of free discussion over conflictual results of fact-finding without any judgement capabilities, and works as liaison between intra-regional and extra regional cooperation for arranging the most effective fact-finding mission for each case.<\/p>\n
\u3000After the panel, Kumagai received comments sharing the same observation about the growing problem of irreconcilable interpretational disputes over a single fact seen both in domestic and international politics, which often leads to the failure of dialogue itself. The comments also included the importance of serious institutional development for fact-finding missions overcoming such crisis.
\n<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u718a\u8c37\u76f4\u5b50\uff08\u56fd\u969b\u5927\u5b66\u51c6\u6559\u6388\uff09\u306f\u3001\u4fe1\u983c\u69cb\u7bc9\u5f37\u5316\u306b\u4e0d\u53ef\u6b20\u3067\u3042\u308a\u7d1b\u4e89\u4e88\u9632\u5916\u4ea4\u5bfe\u7b56\u3068\u3057\u3066\u65e9\u671f\u306a\u767a\u898b\u3068\u4ef2\u4ecb\u304c\u5f79\u7acb\u3064\u3053\u3068\u3092\u8aac\u3044\u305f\u3002<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":17341,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-recent-works","category-current-situation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.gpaj.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.gpaj.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.gpaj.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.gpaj.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.gpaj.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17340"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.gpaj.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17340\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17350,"href":"http:\/\/www.gpaj.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17340\/revisions\/17350"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.gpaj.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.gpaj.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.gpaj.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.gpaj.org\/ja\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}